This page describes the standards that we will employ in assigning grades to written work. Specifically, it describes our general attitude towards grades, what letter grades mean, the numerical scale that will be used to compute the final grade, and how the penalty for late papers is calculated.
If you have questions about these standards, or if you think they have not been followed accurately in a particular case, please let me know. It is very important to me both that your work is given a fair evaluation and that you see it that way.
To get a sense of how we apply these standards, we recommend reading the page of advice on philosophical writing.
We are committed to seeing that our students are able to do very high quality work and that high quality work will be recognized. We do not employ a curve and there is nothing competitive about grading in this course.
Grades apply to papers, not to people. They have no bearing on whether we like or respect you. In particular, they do not measure improvement or hard work. This is because there is no fair way to assess these factors.
Even if there were a way of assessing effort and progress, it would be misleading for grades to reflect these things since one may put a lot of effort into trying to make a bad idea work or produce a very good paper with ease. Trust me, Green has (Brown can speak for herself) done both. So we try to confine myself to offering as honest an evaluation of the work itself as we can.
We understand that it is stressful and unpleasant to have one’s work graded. We don’t particularly enjoy doing it for that very reason. While we think we make far too much of grades, they are a good way of communicating where written work stands on as objective a scale as we can devise. Just bear in mind that this is really all that they involve.
You should see a number on your paper that falls within the range of a given letter grade. Using numbers like this makes it easy to implement a no-fault late policy and to employ some discrimination within grades by giving higher or lower numbers within the range for a given grade.
Final grades will be assigned using the College’s grade scale, as described on p. 38 of the 2007-08 Catalog. The table shows how they will be assigned. The numerical average must be greater than half the distance between two grades in order to earn the higher grade.
The weight given to each assignment is described in the syllabus.
|A||12||11.5 < A ≤ 12|
|A-||11||10.5 < A- ≤ 11.5|
|B+||10||9.5 < B+ ≤ 10.5|
|B||9||8.5 < B ≤ 9.5|
|B-||8||7.5 < B- ≤ 8.5|
|C+||7||6.5 < C+ ≤ 7.5|
|C||6||5.5 < C ≤ 6.5|
|C-||5||4.5 < C- ≤ 5.5|
|D+||4||3.5 < D+ ≤ 4.5|
|D||3||2.5 < D ≤ 3.5|
|D-||2||1.0 < D ≤ 2.5|
|F||0||0.0 < F ≤ 1|
We understand that you can get jammed up with assignments. We do two things to help. First, we give you a lot of time to complete writing assignments. Second, we accept late papers with no questions asked and a mild penalty. (we have to have some incentive to turn them in on time, for obvious reasons).
So, plan ahead and do the assignment well in advance. But if your plans go awry, disaster strikes, opportunity knocks, or you’re stuck for whatever reason, turn it in a day late. It won’t kill you.
Late papers will be accepted without question for up to ten days past the due date. They will be penalized at the rate of one quarter point per day. Since papers are due on Fridays, a ten-day extension encompasses two additional weekends. For the purposes of this clause, papers are due at the beginning of class and the ten-day extension ends at the beginning of Monday’s class ten days after the Friday deadline.
The final project is due on the last day of class and the automatic extension expires at the end of the college’s exam period (which happens to be the exam slot for courses taught MW 1:15), which is Friday, December 21, at 5:00 pm. Longer extensions will be considered only in truly unusual and exigent circumstances, a set of categories into which writer’s block, alas, does not fall. It’s too common.