Primary and secondary rules
Primary rules are rules for behavior. They say what you are permitted and forbidden from doing. And they tell you what you are capable and incapable of doing, like, making a will or deciding a case in court. Secondary rules are rules about rules. They concern how to make, modify, and interpret rules.
Hart identifies three kinds of secondary rules as essential for legal systems.
- The rule of recognition is used to identify the rules that are laws and distinguish them from those that are not laws.
- Rules of change are used to make and alter laws.
- Rules of adjudication are used to settle conflicting interpretations of the law.
For example, in our society, rules passed by Congress and signed by the President are recognized as law because the Constitution says they are in Article 1, Section 7. That functions as a rule of recognition and a rule of change. The Constitution is clearly part of our laws, but its rules do not involve commands or sanctions. Similarly, we recognize judges as having the authority to interpret laws and settle disputes about them. They get this authority from other laws that give them this authority.
While you could construe the laws that create the judiciary as commands (Austin) or useful guides to making predictions (Holmes and Frank), Hart thinks it is much clearer to simply call them rules.